Certain telematic communication distortions on the labour proceeding
Keywords:
Judicial Administration Counselor, telematic communications, labour jurisdiction, adress, deadline, acts of communication, written submissions, Lexnet.Abstract
The technological revolution of communications has ended up reaching the Administration of Justice, colliding with its structures. New problems solved by court resolutions, have arisen regarding electronic communications between courts and the rest of legal practitioners intervening in the process, due to its compulsory nature. In this paper we try to analyze, from a practical point of view, some of these problems in the field of labour jurisdiction, according to the Code of Civil Procedure, of which it is subsidiary.
References
DE LAMO RUBIO, J.:” La «sede judicial electrónica» y los derechos del trabajador en caso de empresas desaparecidas”. Diario La Ley, Nº 9037, Sección Tribuna, 8 de Septiembre de 2017, Editorial Wolters Kluwer.
DE LAMO RUBIO, J.: “Citación telemática a juicio y nulidad de actuaciones judiciales en el orden social”. Diario La Ley, Nº 9181, Sección Tribuna, 19 de Abril de 2018, Editorial Wolters Kluwer.
MARTÍNEZ J.: “LexNET: Análisis de los artículos 56.5 y 60.3.2.ª LRJS y del cómputo de los plazos procesales en el orden jurisdiccional social en relación con el artículo 162 LEC”. Diario La Ley, Nº 8844, Sección Tribuna, 17 de Octubre de 2016, Ref. D-363, Editorial Wolters Kluwer.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors authorize the reproduction and public communication of the full texts of their articles for the purpose of their inclusion in the Dialnet database, as well as in others necessary to guarantee the impact of the research works.
