Proportionality as a guiding principle for coercive procedural measures
Abstract
This paper analyzes the formation of proportionality as a general principle of law, since its originated as a philosophical concept as developed by Plato and Aristotle to its current incarnation as a Constitutional rule, adopted definitely in Spain in the 1990’s. Since the beginning, proportionality was seen as a restitution principle in the biblical formulation of the “an eye for an eye” rule. But later, specially since the works of Beccaria on, it was transformed into a principle that seeks that every Court adopted measure inflicts the lesser possible pain while achieving the maximum effectiveness. Hence, as a general principle, proportionality must inform every decision that implements a coercive procedural measure, such as seizures, confiscation, deposit, eviction, etc.
References
ACHÓN BRUÑEN, M.J., La administración judicial de bienes embargados: problemas que plantea y diferencias con la administración para pago, Práctica de Tribunales, 132 (2018)
ACHÓN BRUÑÉN, M.J., La administración para pago de bienes embargados tras la reforma de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil por la Ley 13/2009, de 3 de noviembre, Diario La Ley, Sección Doctrina, 7458 (2010)
ACHÓN BRUÑÉN, M.J., Soluciones a problemas prácticos en las enajenaciones forzosas de bienes embargados e hipotecados (Las Rozas, 2015)
ALEXY, R., Los derechos fundamentales y el principio de proporcionalidad, Revista española de derecho constitucional, 91 (2011) 11-29 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3621584.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 IVAN FRUCTUOSO GONZALEZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors authorize the reproduction and public communication of the full texts of their articles for the purpose of their inclusion in the Dialnet database, as well as in others necessary to guarantee the impact of the research works.